Counter narcotics efforts in afghanistan what counts

This report draws important lessons from U. Others attempted to encourage more ministries in the Afghan government to address the issue. The government in London would pay 350 US dollars to farmers for each jerib 0. Army Photo by Staff Sgt.

Int. Engagement

However, these units were built at significant cost to the U. The areas shaded red 2013 and blue 2015 show poppy cultivation near the Tolukan Canal in 2013 and 2015. Eradication efforts had no lasting impact, and eradication was not consistently conducted in the same geographic locations as development assistance. In a major drug-producing country, illicit drug crops may form a backbone of the economy. The sum of all opium seizures from 2008 through March 2018 was about 5 percent of the opium produced in 2017 alone.

US anti-narcotic effort in Afghanistan is a costly failure, official report finds

This was, however, not necessarily a function of specific counternarcotics interventions, but instead, a result of broader efforts to improve security, governance, and development.

Only the ambassador, as chief of mission, has sufficient authority over all agencies in country to direct those agencies toward shared counternarcotics goals. It also meant that the UN adopted the US position of a drugs economy controlled by the insurgents, although it had had a more balanced stance before.

An Afghan National Army commando with 3rd Company, 1st Special Operations Kandak, looks through his scope as he patrols through a poppy field during a clearing operation in Khugyani District, Nangarhar Province, Afghanistan, May 9, 2013. This makes it critical that U. In 2013, an estimated 209,000 hectares were planted with opium poppy, and in 2014 224,000 hectares. Four U. GIS imagery analysis can clearly link development program inputs with drug-crop levels in subsequent years to determine which programs contributed to reduced—or increased—cultivation.

In 2005, Embassy Kabul issued the first U. Some projects, for example improvements to irrigation systems, even contributed to increased poppy cultivation. Though U. Crop mapping shows significant growth of poppy in areas that were targeted by eradication, with poppy cultivation rising from less than 1 percent of the total land in 2006 to 36 percent in 2012.

United States Counternarcotics Efforts in Afghanistan

Even at its highest estimated levels, eradication never reached more than 10 percent of the poppy cultivated in Afghanistan. Andrew Quilty, 2015. Skip Recommendations. Focusing eradication efforts in areas with improved security and where alternative livelihoods exist is more likely to achieve lasting results.

Alternative development programming was often based on a poor understanding of why poppy was grown and failed to address the multiple economic roles played by poppy in rural Afghanistan. If host-nation political leaders actively work to obstruct the activities of specialized units, U. This was not very successful nor did it have a desired impact, because intelligence was often flawed or provided by Afghan allies to settle personal scores.